Wednesday, 22 July 2026

Why hell?

 In my previous post I addressed Jesus' preaching on hell. It is non-negotiable that hell exists. After all, we say in the Apostles Creed: "... (Jesus) was crucified, died and was buried; he descended into hell; on the third day he rose again from the dead....". This also refers to the mystery of hell as pre-existing the Resurrection and is sometimes referred to as the "harrowing of Hell" when Jesus descends to the Underworld to free the souls who had died. St Paul writes: "When it says, 'He ascended' what does it mean but that he had also descended into the lower parts of earth?" (Eph 4: 9) In the Office of Readings for Holy Saturday an ancient homily says: 

"Truly he goes to seek out our first parents like lost sheep; he wishes to visit those who sit in darkness and in the shadow of death. he goes to free the prisoner Adam and his fellow prisoner Eve from their pains, he who is God, and Adam's son.

The Lord goes in to them holding his victorious weapon, his cross. When Adam, the first created man, sees him, he strikes his breast in terror and calls out to all: 'My Lord be with you all.' And Christ in reply says to Adam: 'And with your spirit.' And grasping his hand he raises him up, saying: 'Awake, O sleeper, arise from the dead, and Christ will give you light.' "

So, our first idea of hell is that state which held souls prior to the Resurrection of our Lord Jesus Christ. By rising he created heaven, which enabled souls to experience the divine life. This is the basis of the Universal Church which encompasses the whole of humanity in the fulfillment of the plan of the Holy Trinity for the human race from the beginning: "At this moment, as the Fathers put it, all the just from the time of Adam, 'from Abel, the just one, to the last of the elect' will be gathered together with the Father in the universal Church." (Lumen Gentium, 2)

However, when we hear Jesus speak of hell or Gehenna, he is referring to a state or place of never ending punishment which is different in character from the concept of Sheol, which is the state of the dead prior to the Resurrection. In the Bood of Revelation, it says: "Whoever conquers will not be harmed by the second death." (Rev 2: 11) This state is the enduring deprivation of the vision of God which has no remedy. Jesus warns of a peril greater than physical death when he teaches: "Do not fear those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul; rather fear him who can destroy both soul and body in hell." (Mtt 10: 28)

It is interesting that our Lord makes the distinction between physical death and hell. It is also a place where body and soul experience suffering. This points not only to the reality of the bodily resurrection but also to a hell which is also experienced bodily. When we die, we do not become angels, who are pure spirit. The human condition presumes bodily existence which in turn presumes existence in space. Hell is therefore not just an idea or a state of existence but also a "place." Thus, by teasing out the implications of biblical data and Jesus' teaching we can arrive at various conclusions that point to the nature of hell.

The first idea I come to is that God is the Creator." He (Jesus) is the image of the unseen God, the firstborn of all creation; for in him all things in heaven and on earth were created, things visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or powers - all things have been created through him and for him." (Col 1: 15-16) The whole of Creation is destined to participate in the divine life of the Holy Trinity with human beings, who are made in the image and likeness of God (Gen 1: 26) receiving the invitation to experience divinization by being joined to the god who created them. 

This brings us to the second point which is the revelation of God's nature. We are told: "... God is light and in him there is no darkness at all" (1 Jn 1: 5) and that God is love: "Whoever does not love, does not know God, for God is love." (1 Jn 4: 8) God, as Creator, does not participate or admit of darkness or of hatred and those who wish to participate in his life are therefore instructed by Lord to imitate God. He tells us that God is "perfect" (Mtt 5: 48) and "merciful." (Lk 6: 36) As the best of fathers, God knows what we need (Lk 11: 13).

Third, evil and sin are not created. These are parasitic upon created things and exists in the same way that a lie does, that is, it only has a reality as long as it is believed. Once the truth is revealed the lie has no purchase on reality.  Satan, as a spirit was created by God, but his kingdom is a lie. Jesus indicates this when he says: "He (the devil) was murderer from the beginning and does not stand in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks according to his own nature, for he is a liar and the father of lies." (Jn 8: 44) The cause of the rebellion of Satan and other evil spirits against the loving rule of God is envy: "... for through the devil's envy death entered the world, and those who belong to his company experience it." (Wis 2: 24)

Fourth, God tolerates evil in this age, but it has no part in eternal life: St Paul tells us: "For he (Jesus) must reign until he has put all his enemies under his feet. The last enemy to be destroyed is death." (1Cor 15: 25-26) We also have the parable of the weeds and the wheat where the Master of the harvest instructs his servants to wait until harvest concludes before the weeds will be destroyed and the righteous gathered in eternal life: "The Son of Man will send his angels, and they will collect out of his kingdom all causes of sin and evildoers, and they will throw them into the furnace of fire, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth." (Mtt 13: 41-42)

This brings us to the fifth point - why allow for those who are evil to remain in existence at all? Jesus tells us that: "He is God not of the dead but of the living." (Mk 12: 27) God is a Creator not a destroyer. Those who do evil do not pass out of existence. Jesus says of Judas Iscariot: "The Son of Man goes as it is written of him, but woe to that one by whom the Son of Man is betrayed! It would be better for that one not to have been born." (Mtt 26: 24) Those whose being is darkness experience the light of God's love not as infinite beatitude but as infinite destruction. Both good and evil encounter God but their experience is diametrically opposed. God does not will this: "This is right and acceptable in the sight of our savior, who desires everyone to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth." (1 Tim 2: 3)

The sixth point builds directly on the fifth. What determines whether I go to hell or not? In the final analysis, it is me. I do so through exercising my freedom just as Satan exercised his. He, as pure spirit, made his definitive choice in an instant. I make my choice throughout the whole of my life. I do not live my life aimlessly or to no effect. I am accountable to the one who loves me and summoned me into existence with the intention that I respond with love for love. What I do in this life matters. In Revelation Jesus tells us: "See I am coming soon my reward is with me, to repay according to everyone's work." (Rev 22: 12) St Paul put it this way: "For all of us must appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each may receive recompense for what has been done in the body, whether good or evil." (2 Cor 5: 10) If I, through my choices, become darkness in this life and estranged from God, I will experience the consequences of my actions in eternity, with the chief suffering caused by my separation from God: "These will suffer the punishment of eternal destruction, separated from the presence of the Lord and from the glory of his might..." (2 Thess 1: 9)

The seventh thought is that we cannot end without having mention of God's mercy. Even if I am darkness even the smallest scintilla of light will open the door to the merciful love of God. This mercy is given us through the sacrifice of the Cross. We hear every time we attend Mass: "For this is the chalice of my blood, the blood of the new and eternal covenant, which will be poured out for you and for many for the forgiveness of sins." The example of the Good Thief, dying in agony alongside the crucified Christ suffices to illustrate the prerogative of mercy which is extended to all those who trust in Jesus and call upon his name even as they are dying: 

"One of the criminals who were hanged there kept deriding him and saying, 'Are you not the Messiah? Save yourself and us! But the other rebuked him, saying, 'Do you not fear God, since you are under the same sentence of condemnation? And we indeed have been condemned justly, for we are getting what we deserve for our deeds, but this man has done nothing wrong.' Then he said, 'Jesus remember me when you come into your kingdom.' He replied, 'Truly I tell you, today you will be with me in Paradise'." (Lk 23: 39-43)




Tuesday, 21 July 2026

Canonical Opinion on SSPX Appeal

 Recently I posted my take on the SSPX appeal to the Holy See against the declaration of their excommunication for schismatic ordinations of bishops. I shared this with a canonist friend of mine, Mr Paul Shogren, who is an independent canonist, for his comment. Among his response was this take on a couple of my ideas. His reply is in red:

3. Appeal Against Sentence I think it better to use 'Recourse' as this is not an appeal against a judicial sentence.

Since the Holy Father indicated, prior to the ordinations, that they would violate the law and trigger automatic excommunication I wonder if, in fact, an appeal is possible or at least advisable? This is not a standard appeal against a decision of an ecclesial authority. The declaration has been made by the Holy See itself. SSPX refer to canon 1353 regarding the suspensive effect that occurs when an appeal is made. However, canon 333 paragraph 3 states: "No appeal or recourse is permitted against a sentence or decree of the Roman Pontiff." The declaration of the penalty was issued by the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith acting on behalf of the Supreme Pontiff and with his permission. This situation would be clearer if the pope had signed the document in forma specifica which would have eliminated any ambiguity. He could also have handed down the sentence in forma Motu Proprio (on his own initiative). In any event, I struggle to see what an appeal would achieve. It can hardly argue the facts of the case and the penalty is automatic. Any appeal is therefore looking to challenge the Law itself as well as the authority of the Legislator to interpret the law as to what constitutes the delict of schism.

For what it's worth, I think the individuals concerned (recalling that the SSPX lacks juridic status) have a reasonable ground for recourse in as much as the declaration of the excommunication seemingly took place without any form of administrative penal process. I note that the DDF, when it declared the excommunication of Archbishop Vigano for schism, undertook an administrative penal process. Of course, one could reply that the DDF would only have foregone the administrative penal process if it had a solid canonical reason e.g. when they consulted the pope about the matter he dispensed the relevant procedural law (being a 'grave and extraordinary matter' the Prefect was bound to do present it to him under art. 31§1 Praedicate evangelium).
Perhaps the DDF are playing strategically here and enticing the SSPX bishops to undertake recourse so there can be some very solid juridic examination, and the SSPX will be forced to explicitly show whether they submit to the jurisdiction of the Pope and the Roman authorities during this recourse and what emerges from it; they will get what they asked for, to have the Pope personally examine their claims, but not on the terms they wanted. Leo says, "Yes I will consider your case, but like everyone else, according to the law, not just because you want to see me." Quite a brilliant strategy if my conjecture is correct.

4. The Office of Pope

If the appeal is against the Code and therefore Vatican II it is not only tilting against the authority of the Successor of Peter but the College of Bishops as a whole. SSPX seem to think that the Pope can act as an autocrat. If they had read the law under which they are appealing they would see canon 330 "Just as by the Lord's decision Saint Peter and the other Apostles constitute one college, so in a like manner the Roman Pontiff, the Successor of Peter, and the other bishops, the successors of the Apostles, are united among themselves." SSPX would be mistaken to think that the Pope would act in an arbitrary or unilateral way to undermine the penal law of the Church and the integrity of not only the 1983 Code but the recent legislation of Pope Benedict XVI regarding graviora delicta (more serious crimes) In short, I fear that SSPX will simply be digging themselves deeper into the hole that they have created by continuing to appeal this excommunication.

Art. 9 of the SST norms state that the DDF is the Supreme Tribunal for all graviora delicta (this is an exception to it being the Rota for judicial penal trials and the Signatura in the case of an administrative penal process), so the SSPX bishops will have their recourse decided by the same dicastery that declared the excommunications. The only recourse after the DDF for these graviora delicta is the Pope. 
I publish this because it gives readers of this blog an idea of how nuanced and complex canonical matters, especially those related to penal law, can be. Even though I am qualified in Canon Law my primary role is to act as Vicar General and as a Parish Priest. I am not suitably up to date with pontifical legislation. The situation can be complex, for example, there are judicial trials and administrative trials which have a separate character. Furthermore, it is not only the Code of Canon Law to be considered but also particular law when it comes to the jurisdiction and obligations of various dicasteries. Lastly, any priest, religious or lay person looking to defend or assert their rights within the Church needs to obtain professional advice rather than interpret the law by themselves. This, of course, costs money but if the issue at stake is important, given that the civil law processes take place on paper, it is crucial that you get the right advice from the outset, so you are not embarrassed as the proceedings or case comes before the appropriate authority.


Monday, 20 July 2026

17th Sunday in Ordinary Time

 Occasionally I hear people say things like: "Why don't priests preach on Hell?" For a start, priests use their homilies to break open the Word. It is not to vent on their personal hobby horses. Canon 767 of the 1983 Code of Canon Law states that: "... in the homily the mysteries of faith and the norms of Christian life are to be explained from the sacred text during the course of the liturgical year." In the Decree on the Life of Priests the Council Father taught: "... in every case their (the priest's) role is to teach not their own wisdom but the Word of God and to issue an urgent invitation to all men to conversion and holiness." (PO. 4) In any event, it is Jesus who preaches. We are his flock whom he feeds with his Word. We need to take seriously the Word we are given is a living and reliable account of the nature of God and the heavenly realities: "Today this scripture is being fulfilled in your hearing." (Lk 4: 21) Today Jesus preaches on Hell: "So it will be at the end of the age. the angels will come out and separate the evil from the righteous and throw them into the furnace of fire, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth." (Mtt 13: 49-50) Elsewhere Jesus describes the state of Hell as: "outer darkness" (Mtt 8:12), "where their worm never dies, and the fire is never quenched" (Mk 9: 48) and a "great chasm... this place of torment" (Lk 16: 26 & 28) The Book of Revelation informs us: "Then Death and Hades were thrown into the lake of fire. This is the second death, the lake of fire; and anyone whose name was not found in the book of life was thrown into the fire." (Rev 20: 14-15) Let us not diminish or deny the consequences of deliberately, consciously and freely rejecting God's love. Let us also pray for others, especially of our acquaintance, that they experience the joy of the Gospel and come to know the love of God which saves us from such a fate.



Thursday, 16 July 2026

Thoughts on the SSPX Appeal

 It has been publicized in mainstream media that the Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX) will appeal their excommunication latae sententiae, by the law itself, which was declared by the Holy See after SSPX ordained four bishops contrary to the law. Without going into depth regarding the substance of the matter I have a few points I would like to make which speak more to the nature of the law and the doctrine enunciated by the Second Vatican Council (Vatican II).

1. Being Under the Law

The very fact that SSPX have appealed against the declared excommunication indicates that they regard themselves as coming under the law and that they were subject to the law prior to the actions they took. This appeal, furthermore, is made under the canons of the 1983 Code of Canon Law. To understand the purpose and intent of the 1983 Code I encourage those interested to read the Apostolic Constitution Sacrae Disciplinae Leges, which was promulgated by Pope St John Paul II in 1983 as he promulgated the law itself. He wrote: "Indeed, in a certain sense this new Code could be understood as a great effort to translate this same conciliar doctrine and ecclesiology into canonical language the conciliar image of the Church." (the emphasis is that of the Holy Father).

In this way it can be said that to place oneself under the law is necessarily to accept the doctrine and discipline of Vatican II which is something that SSPX have always refused! This is despite the fact that the founder of their movement signed the documents of Vatican II in the affirmative. This includes their latest Profession of Faith, in which they name the popes up to Pope Pius XII while pointedly omitting his successors. It can be said that the 1917 Code changed the form of the law but not its content whereas the 1983 Code maintained the form but changed the content. Yet, SSPX have not mentioned the 1917 Code in their appeal while maintaining the ecclesiology and liturgy which was maintained under that Code.

2. Excommunication Latae Sententiae

Excommunication by the law itself means that a trial is not required. With the action, such as cooperating in the procurement of an induced abortion, means the individual is automatically excommunicated upon the completion of the prohibited act. On this occasion the legislator informed SSPX that their proposed action would constitute behaviour subject to the latae sententiae excommunication. All the Holy See has achieved is to declare what the law has done.  In the English common law tradition this is called a summary offence. The onus lies on the offending individual not on the Crown. The onus, therefore, in this situation lies on SSPX to show that their actions did not in fact trigger the excommunication. This would involve an interpretation of the law which would directly oppose the explicit communication of the legislator himself. They are not in a position to challenge the legislator himself without confirming the truth of their schismatic behaviour.

3. Appeal Against Sentence

Since the Holy Father indicated, prior to the ordinations, that they would violate the law and trigger automatic excommunication I wonder if, in fact, an appeal is possible or at least advisable? This is not a standard appeal against a decision of an ecclesial authority. The declaration has been made by the Holy See itself. SSPX refer to canon 1353 regarding the suspensive effect that occurs when an appeal is made. However, canon 333 paragraph 3 states: "No appeal or recourse is permitted against a sentence or decree of the Roman Pontiff." The declaration of the penalty was issued by the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith acting on behalf of the Supreme Pontiff and with his permission. This situation would be clearer if the pope had signed the document in forma specifica which would have eliminated any ambiguity. He could also have handed down the sentence in forma Motu Proprio (on his own initiative). In any event, I struggle to see what an appeal would achieve. It can hardly argue the facts of the case and the penalty is automatic. Any appeal is therefore looking to challenge the Law itself as well as the authority of the Legislator to interpret the law regarding what constitutes the delict of schism.

4. The Office of Pope

If the appeal is against the Code and therefore Vatican II it is not only tilting against the authority of the Successor of Peter but the College of Bishops as a whole. SSPX seem to think that the Pope can act as an autocrat. If they had read the law under which they are appealing they would see canon 330 "Just as by the Lord's decision Saint Peter and the other Apostles constitute one college, so in a like manner the Roman Pontiff, the Successor of Peter, and the other bishops, the successors of the Apostles, are united among themselves." SSPX would be mistaken to think that the Pope would act in an arbitrary or unilateral way to undermine the penal law of the Church and the integrity of not only the 1983 Code but the recent legislation of Pope Benedict XVI regarding graviora delicta (more serious crimes) In short, I fear that SSPX will simply be digging themselves deeper into the hole that they have created by continuing to appeal this excommunication.

5. Conclusion

SSPX finds itself in an awkward position. It is challenging the Code while trying to use the Code. It is acknowledging the reality of excommunication while saying that no excommunication is justified even when it was told, in no uncertain terms, that their behaviour amounted to schism. Their fundamental choice is to become fully sede vacantist or to repent of their schismatic behaviour and reconcile with the Holy See.




Sunday, 12 July 2026

16th Sunday in Ordinary Time

 What a beautiful reading we are given for the First Reading today! We hear: "Although you (God) are sovereign in strength, you judge with mildness, and with great forbearance you govern us, for you have power to act whenever you choose. Through such works you have taught your people that the righteous must be kind, and you have filled your children with good hope, because you give repentance for sins." (Wis 12: 18-19) Thus, if we wish to be righteous we must be kind. Indeed, if we wish to be loving we must be kind: "Love is patient; love is kind; love is not envious or boastful..." (1 Cor 13: 4). If we bear the fruit of the Holy Spirit, likewise, kindness is required: "By contrast, the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, generosity, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control." (Gal 5: 22) Let this reading help us in our familial and work relationships so that we act with forbearance and kindness. Many people come to confession with anger as an issue or sin against which they struggle. Sometimes this is derived from weakness and resentment with the remembrance of past hurts. May our faith help us to imitate God and act with kindness towards those who are close to us: "Be merciful, as your Father is merciful" (Lk 6: 36) and "Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect" (Mtt 5: 48)




Thursday, 9 July 2026

Thoughts on Amoris Laetitia

 Shortly, Pope Leo will lead a conference focused on the reception of the document Amoris Laetitia (AL) which was promulgated by his predecessor Pope Francis. This document, not unlike Humanae Vitae (HV) in 1968, received a hostile reception in some quarters as commentators perceived it, on the basis of one footnote, as sanctioning laxity in the area of remarried divorced Catholics and the reception of Holy Communion. HV also is known for its rejection of artificial contraception but like AL encompassed a much larger context and perspective around human relationships and family life. So my first point in this discussion is that the document be read as a whole.

However, I in this treatment of the subject I would like to point out two canonical maxims which are relevant to pastoral praxis. These maxims represent the wisdom of centuries of engagement with sin and salvation mediated through the ministry of the Church. After all, we read in canon 27 of the 1983 Code of Canon Law, that: "Custom is the best interpreter of laws." I take this to mean that the law of the Catholic Church is not the blind and rigid product of a machine but is meant to be lived in the context of a living communion and attentive to the needs of the people whom it serves. The Legislator, who is part of that communion, acts within the lived tradition and unwritten laws that have guided it from the beginning.

The first maxim is: "In cases of moral and physical impossibility the law does not bind." This is mentioned in the Code at canon 960 which speaks of the sacrament of penance as the ordinary means for those conscious of their guilt of grave sin to be reconciled to God and the Church. The canon continues: "Only physical or moral impossibility excuses from confession of this type; in such a case reconciliation can be obtained by other means." In a wide range of cases I have found individuals who wish to participate in the life of the sacraments but are constrained on the face of it though factors beyond his or her control. We cannot allow the law to be pushed into absurdity by bizarre or unusual cases for which the law was not designed in the first place.

This leads us to the second maxim: "The salvation of souls is the supreme law of the Church." The vindication of the law is to be found in love (Rm 13: 10). The Church loves her children and seeks the salvation of the whole of humanity according to the mission given her by the divine Saviour. She does not want to hear the reproach of the Lord who said: "Woe also to you, lawyers! For you load people with burdens hard to bear, and you yourselves do not lift a finger to ease them." (Lk 11: 46) This maxim is enshrined in the final canon of the 1983 Code: "... and the salvation of souls, which must (lat. debet esse) always be the supreme law of the Church, is to be kept before one's eyes." (c. 1752) The imperative here tells us that salus animarum (the salvation of souls) is not optional. 

Thus, the pastors of the Church, in applying the law, are called to temper the objective severity that is necessary to protect sacraments and situations as well as discouraging sin, to draw everyone including sinners closer to God. To this end, the synodal process helps us to listen to others and hear their stories and experience of the law and the Church. It does not abrogate the law, but it renders the hearts of pastors open to the demands of love as well as the certainty of law.



Monday, 6 July 2026

SSPX and the Five Pillars of Protestantism

 In a previous post I referred to the SSPX as heading towards a position of being Protestant. How is this possible since they believe themselves to be more Catholic than the Pope? In this analysis I will look at the five constitutive elements of traditional Protestant theology which underpin their ecclesiology.  In reality these pillars presume a Catholic context and were intended as a means of reform but ended up becoming effectively a separate religion. I do not believe this to necessarily be the case in practice today. This is reflected in the theology of Communion from Vaytican II to which SSPX objects so vigorously. A lot of water has flown under the bridge since 1517! Nevertheless, if we look at what has happened to the Old Catholics, who separated from the Pope in 1870, they end up drifting into full communion with the Anglican church and other ecclesial communities which adhere to a fundamentally Protestant position.

1. The Corruption of the Papacy

According to this pillar the papacy is a fraud. The true church is a fellowship of true believers who were suppressed by the papacy in its lust for money and power. SSPX, in their Profession of Faith, accuse all the popes subsequent to Pius XII of being guilty of heresy. The penalty for heresy is latae sententiae excommunication and the loss of office. If SSPX are correct the Papal See is now vacant since the papacy is both a personal charism and an office. This was illustrated when Pope Benedict XVI resigned but retired as Pope Emeritus.

Being sede vacantist not only means repudiating the present pope. It includes impugning the College of Cardinals and of Bishops. It means that the Holy Spirit has not guided the Church in electing true Successors of Peter to be the rock of unity and to strengthen his brothers. In sum, since the Petrine Office is constitutive of Church, properly speaking, the Catholic Church is considered as being effectively anti-Church and the present Poper as an anti-Pope or even an anti-Christ.

2. The Priesthood of the Baptized

Once apostolic continuity has been broken, since the College of Bishops no longer legitimately transmits apostolic power through legitimate ordination by the laying on of hands, where does priestly ministry finds its validity. It must do so through sacramental means. If ordination in communion with Rome is not possible the foundation for priestly ministry can only be located in baptism. Having lost the ontological connection to apostolic ministry, through the rupture with the Successor of Peter, ministry becomes functional. At the SSPX ordination of their bishops they replaced the pontifical mandate with a construction of their own and justified the action by the pastoral needs of the Society. This means that the role is a functional one. Protestant ministers do not differ from their flock on account of ontology or an essential difference (see LG 10) rather they serve in a different capacity ultimately based in baptism. They have a job not a ministry.

3. Sola Scriptura (by Scripture alone)

If connection with Apostolic authority has gone and the priesthood is a function founded in baptism from where can authority be obtained? It cannot be from Rome and the mandate given St Peter by the Lord. Authority must be derived from Sacred Scripture, the interpretation of which is handed down by leaders of SSPX. It is they who as self-appointed verifiers of Biblical data and tradition decide what is truly "Catholic" in the absence of the Petrine Office and the College of Bishops gathered around him. The Anglican Church, which is really an ecclesial community, speaks of a three-legged stool of Sacraments, Scripture and Reason. This approach has led them to ordain women to the priesthood and to accept same-sex marriage! Additionally, having repudiated the Second Vatican Council, which of the Ecumenical Councils is accepted? Again, the authority to determine this will be sheeted back to how these Councils truly reflect the scriptural data. The decision lies with the doctrinal watchdogs of the SSPX hierarchy who fulfil a function arising from the pastoral need of their community. This sounds a lot like the "reason" leg of the Anglican stool.

4. Sola Fide (by faith alone)

In the Catholic Church, unlike the Protestant ecclesial communities, faith is not merely that of the individual. We pray in the baptismal liturgy, after the baptismal promises: "This is the faith of the Church. We are proud to profess it in Christ the Lord." This is the collective faith handed down over the centuries by the popes. It belongs to everyone. It cannot be subject to arbitrary choice. SSPX have decided that faith is something that they get to choose and define and that we are saved by adhering to it. We are no longer saved through the sacraments of the Catholic Church since these are tainted by the heresy alleged of the popes since 1962. In short, if salvation does not come through the Catholic faith maintained by the Pope and College of Bishops it must be brought about through faith alone. This is faith primarily in our Lord Jesus Christ however, since in the Nicene Creed, we pray: "I believe in one, holy, catholic and apostolic Church" one is led to believe that the SSPX belief in their own probity as guardians of Catholic tradition this is constitutive of their faith as individuals who choose to protest the legitimacy of the Roamn Catholic Church. Instead of having one Pope the individual and personal assent of faith means that each believer becomes his or her own pope!

5. Sola Gratia (by grace alone)

Since individual faith, manifested in obedience to the programme and theology of SSPX, mediates salvation it follows that we are saved by grace alone. We do not cooperate with grace since our reasoning, represented by the development of doctrine at Vatican II, avails us naught. The antiquarianism of the Society determines that history has come to an end. The doctrine of the Church is preserved in amber, beautiful but inert. The sacraments of the Catholic Church no longer objectively mediate salvation. The society founded on the act of faith of Peter and his Successors is illegitimate, if not pernicious and sinful. The believer is therefore saved by grace since the sacraments serve merely a pastoral function when they are divorced from the authority of the Holy See. Those priests ordained by the Catholic Church are all suspect and thus the validity of the sacraments they confect. The Church they serve is not an extension of the Incarnation but a human construct subject to all the weaknesses that attend that condition. The infallibility of the Pope, ex cathedra, only holds with their permission. The infallibility of Ecumenical Councils on matters of defined doctrine likewise requires their imprimatur and nihil obstat. The sensus fidelium of the millions of Catholics who are obedient to the See of Peter and their bishops means nothing. Without the institution the means for justification can only be that of grace alone.

Conclusion

All of this points to the constitutive nature of the Petrine office as the essential guarantor of Catholic faith and sacraments - ubi Petrus, ibi Ecclesia (Where Peter, there the Church) The Marian Fiat and the Petrine Tu es Christus form the foundations of the Church as a society of divine origin which is in the world but not of the world. It cannot be treated as a museum piece immune to change. After all, Pope Pius XI allowed for the liturgy in the vernacular in the Syro-Malabar rite, and Pope Pius XII reformed the liturgy for Holy Week in 1955. The Hypostatic Union of the Saviour, Second Person of the Holy Trinity, also holds for the Church, human and divine. SSPX cannot usurp this reality no matter how sincere they are in their beliefs. There is no salvation in disobedience and protest.







Sunday, 5 July 2026

15th Sunday in Ordinary Time

 Why is the reception of the Good News so inconsistent? For some the Mass is a grace filled moment of encounter with the God who loves them enough to die for them: "But blessed are your eyes, for they see, and your ears for they hear. Truly I tell you, many prophets and righteous people longed to see what you see, but did not see it, and to hear what you hear, but did not hear it" (Mtt 13: 16-17) Yet others, including many cradle Catholics, remain indifferent to the Holy Eucharist? The Gospel gives the following reasons: "When anyone hears the word of the kingdom and does not understand it the evil one comes and snatches away what is sown in the heart... a person who has no root, but endures only for a while, and when trouble or persecution arises on account of the word, that person immediately falls away... the one who hears the word, but the cares of the world and the lure of wealth choke the word, and it yields nothing." (Mtt 13: 19; 21 and 22) I propose an additional reason, which St Paul gives to explain why the Jews refuse to accept the Gospel: "I can testify that they (the Jews) have a zeal for God, but it is not enlightened. For being ignorant of the righteousness that comes from God, and seeking to establish their own, they have not submitted to God's righteousness. For Christ is the end of the law so that there may be righteousness for everyone who believes." (Rm 10: 2-4) If we substitute "values" for "law" we can understand that many people hope to serve God through living out values, many of which are received from or articulated by the Catholic Church. St Paul tells us that such an approach is futile and will not yield the fruit of the Kingdom: "For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ, and him crucified. And I came to you in weakness and in fear and in much trembling. My speech and my proclamation were not with plausible words of wisdom, but with a demonstration of the Spirit and of power, so that your faith might rest not on human wisdom but on the power of God." (1 Cor 2: 2-5) Let us, therefore, be sure to keep Jesus Christ at the centre of our faith.



Tuesday, 30 June 2026

Excommunication of SSPX

 By the time I write this, I expect that the illicit ordination of bishop by the Society of St Pius X (SSPX) will have taken place. Pope Leo XIV has told the Society: "I pray for you, because to tear the seamless garment of Christ is a sin of extreme gravity." When he uses the expression "extreme gravity" he is alluding to the canonical offences outlined under the pontificate of Pope Benedict XVI as graviora delicta (more serious offences/crimes) which was codified in the new Book of Processes included in the 1983 Code of Canon Law. This means that if SSPX do indeed proceed with the ordinations they will be excommunicated latae sententiae, that is, by the law itself. No trial is required. The Pope can choose to declare the excommunication to confirm that the penalty has been incurred.

How did we get to this? It is a long story. I will restrict myself to a brief narrative. When SSPX, whose founder had been present at Vatican II and signed the documents in the affirmative, illicitly ordained bishops, in defiance of Pope St John Paul II, the offending bishops were excommunicated. Subsequently, the excommunications were lifted in 1 July 1988 by Joseph Ratzinger the prefect for the CDF. When he became Pope Benedict XVI had talks with the Society. In those the society recognized him as the legitimate successor of Peter. This had the effect of recognizing his predecessors going back to Pope St John XXIII. Some of the members of SSPX refused to accept this and remain as sede vacantists, that is, they do not recognize the popes after Pope Pius XII as true popes. The Holy Father also granted the indult Summorum Pontificum in July 7, 2007 to give greater access to the Mass in the extraordinary form, as it was termed. Furthermore, once this agreement was reached Pope Benedict moved the discussion with SSPX from the competence of the Congregation for Divine Worship to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. In other words, this was no longer a situation of disagreement over liturgy but one of potential heresy since SSPX refused to accept the decrees of an Ecumenical Council.

Recently, SSPX have sent an affirmation of faith to the Holy See. It is interesting that it mentions there a repudiation of errors stating: "I consequently reject all errors contrary to this Faith, and in particular those of liberalism, indifferentism, modernism, ecumenism, and laicism, condemned by Popes Pius IX, Leo XIII, Saint Pius X, Pius XI, and Pius XII." In other words, it seems they allege these errors against all popes from Pope St John XXIII onwards. They have effectively returned to a sede vacantist posture. This is also a complete rejection of the Second Vatican Council which entails a rejection of canon 749 paragraph 2 in the 1983 Code declaring the infallibility of Ecumenical Councils, when they declare doctrine which is to be held as definitive by the faithful. The ordinations of bishops reveals a deeper truth. SSPX have a position that can only be maintained by those who repudiate the popes from Pope St John XXIII onwards. This position becomes more and more untenable as time passes. It is inconceivable that the Holy Spirit would deny the Church a pope for a long period of time. Such protests end up in the position of the Protestants which accuse the papacy of being a fraud perpetrated on the true Church which remain invisible and incorrupt. When you have one of the pillars of Protestantism the others will follow: faith alone, grace alone, Scripture alone and the priesthood of the baptized.

Given that there are congregations and religious orders, that celebrate the Mass in the extraordinary form and are in full communion with the Holy See, I anticipate that those who love the Mass in its pre-conciliar form will have to make a choice. They either follow the hierarchy of SSPX and risk schism along with them, or they adhere to full communion with the Catholic Church which maintains the legitimacy of the Second Vatican Council and the legitimacy of the popes. I do not think there is room for compromise. the theology of Communion which is fundamental to understanding Vatican II is not up for debate. As a dogmatic constitution Lumen Gentium, by definition, is fixed doctrine that has been stated by the Church to be free from error. The excuse of SSPX for the ordinations was to meet the pastoral needs of the people but the excommunication latae sententiae will damage the pastoral life as followers of SSPX will receive invalid sacraments from the hands of excommunicated bishops.




Monday, 29 June 2026

14th Sunday in Ordinary Time

 Catholics need to be alert, in contemporary culture particularly, about slipping into Deism. This type of religion denies the possibility of revelation and tends to think of God in terms of a nebulous divine energy. In the early centuries this was expressed in Gnosticism and in the present day by movements such as Unitarianism and Theosophy. Here Jesus is merely a teacher. He has a higher wisdom that emanates from the divine and is not expressed in his humanity. Today's Gospel tells us otherwise. Jesus reveals a God whom he refers to as "my Father." He says: " 'All things have been handed over to me by my Father, and no one knows the Son except the Father, and no one knows the Father except the Son'..." (Mtt 11: 27) This is an exclusive relationship which finds expression in the doctrine of the Holy Trinity. We affirm this every time we pray the Creed at Mass. It is Jesus who reveals the truth about God in his own person. Jesus tells Philip elsewhere: "Whoever has seen me has seen the Father." (Jn 14: 9) What is amazing, however, is that Jesus does not keep this relationship to himself. He invites us to know the Father through him: " '... and anyone to whom the Son chooses to reveal him.' " (Mtt 11: 27) This is not a barren intellectual exercise. It bears fruit in believers of consolation, mercy and peace as they accept the invitation to participate in God's interior life, as revealed by the Son: " 'Come to me, all you that are weary and are carrying heavy burdens, and I will give you rest. Take my yoke upon you, and learn from me; for I am gentle and humble of heart, and you will find rest for your souls. For my yoke is easy, and my burden is light.' " (Mtt 11: 28-30) The process of divinization this relationship initiates, St Paul tells us, is brought about through the Holy Spirit: "If the Spirit of God who raised Jesus from the dead dwells in you, he who raised Christ from the dead will give life to your mortal bodies also through the Spirit that dwells in you."  (Rm 8: 11)



Sunday, 28 June 2026

Solemnity of St Peter and St Paul

 Today's feast helps us to realize that the Catholic Church, like the Holy Trinity itself, is not a monolithic unity but a dynamic and synthetic unity. This is perspective is assisted by the theology of Hans Urs von Balthasar which was given magisterial approval by Pope St John Paul II in the Catechism of the Catholic Church, when the Church teaches of the Petrine and Marian dimensions of the Church (CCC 773). It is significant that St Peter's Square, in the Vatican City, has a statue of St Peter on one side and a statue of St Paul on the other. The keys and the sword stand together.  In this theology, which was designed to affirm the unity of the Catholic Church, the Petrine dimension refers to the juridical and hierarchical nature of the Church, while the Pauline dimension is the missionary aspect of the Church. The other dimensions include the Marian, which is the holiness of the Church and the Johannine, which is the contemplative dimension. In my opinion, one could also add the Judas dimension, which is the sinful aspect of the Church, although this was never intended by the Lord. The stability and institutional memory of the Petrine dimension is given energy and exothermal energy by the missionary zeal of the Pauline. Neither of these is perfect. Both of them look to Mary. In the Second Reading today, st Paul writes in the context of a failing relationship with the churches in Galatia. The Gospel speaks of Peter meeting risen Christ after betraying him on Good Friday. In conclusion, we have the picture of the Apostles shaking hands to express their unity and affirm the holy order of the Universal Mission of the Church given by the Lord in the Great Commission (Mtt 28: 19--20): "... when they (Peter, James, brother of the Lord, and John) saw that I had been entrusted with the gospel to the uncircumcised. just as Peter had been entrusted with the gospel for the circumcised (for he who worked through Peter making him an apostle to the circumcised also worked through me in sending me to the Gentiles) and when James and Cephas and John, who were acknowledged pillars, recognized the grace that had been given to me, they gave Barnabas and me the right hand of fellowship, agreeing that we should go to the Gentiles and they to the circumcised." (Gal 2: 7-10) 



Friday, 26 June 2026

How did the German Bishops get it so wrong, again?!

 In a previous post I asked the same question regarding the Synodal Path in Germany and the failed Synodal Council. Sadly, the German Bishops have been shown up again in the reply of the Holy See to them refusing the possibility of allowing non-clergy to preach homilies. Hence, I tag onto the title of the blogpost "again?!" Why can this be seen as such a humiliating situation? Surely, one might ask, they had the right to request such a dispensation from the liturgical and canonical law of a merely ecclesiastical provision?

Why is this such a humiliation for the bishops? For a start, there is already an authentic interpretation of the law from the Pontifical Council for the Interpretation of Canonical Texts which was given on 26 May 1987. This denied the possibility of dispensing from the norm that the homily can be given by anyone other than the ordained. It is clear from canon 767 para 1 that the homily "is part of the liturgy itself" (lat. quae est pars ipsius liturgiae). I think we can also go on to point out that the proclamation of the Word, which includes the homily, is declared by the Church to be "the first duty" (lat. primum officium) for the ordained minister (Presbyterorum ordinis, 4). St Paul declares also: "and woe to me if I do not proclaim the gospel!" (1 Cor 9: 16). Hence, the homily is not only constitutive of the liturgy itself but also of ordained ministry. It is not impossible to dispense from divine law.

Again, how can the German Bishops get something so obvious wrong? Why do they wish to undermine the ordained ministry? How do they understand their own ministry especially as bishops who are called to proclaim the Word in their own cathedrals and elsewhere?

If we go back prior to Vatican II it was thought that the sermon or homily, being in the vernacular, was not a part of the Mass proper. Hence, priests would make the Sign of the Cross to indicated the start of the homily and repeat this at the conclusion to show that the sacred action was about to resume. There was provision in the liturgy for notices and other information pertinent to the congregation, also to be given at this time, which was referred to as Prone. In addition, the liturgical law grants the possibility that when the congregation is composed of young children and the priest is elderly or in some other way unable to communicate effectively with the youngsters that their teacher can speak. I would say that this provision comes under the canonical maxim "in cases of moral or physical impossibility the law does not bind." Or, it might be said that this provision is a liturgical norm that is, in fact, an anomaly which needs to be corrected given the interpretations given elsewhere. There was also given the opportunity to give an explanation of the context of the readings prior to their proclamation, as the Church transitioned from Latin to the vernacular. On occasions such an explanation might have been given to lay people just as they often do an introduction to the Mass or read out notices at the conclusion of the celebration. Most of all, however, I think the German Bishops are looking to circumvent the inability of the Church to ordain women to the priesthood. Given that there were deaconesses in the early Church, and that deacons can preach homilies, there was a possibility in their minds that lay women, deaconesses or otherwise, might take this role.

There is a necessary distinction, which also should be made for the homilist as for the lay person, between preaching in canon 766 and homilies. This is given in canon 767 para 1 itself where it is pointed out that the homily: "... the mysteries of faith and the norms of Christian life are to be explained from the sacred text during the course of the liturgical year" (lat. in eadem per anni liturgici cursum ex textu sacro fidei mysteria et normae vitae christianae exponantur). To my mind the key words here are "the sacred text." This means that the homilist is not moralizing. teaching or lecturing the people. he is breaking open the Word which has just been proclaimed to the congregation by the ordained minister. he is not free to say whatever he likes. He is at the service of the Gospel. He preaches with apostolic authority given to the Apostles by the Lord and handed on by them to their successors to the ordained. This is attested to by St Justin Martyr who records about AD 150:

"And on the day called Sunday, all who live in cities or in the country gather together to one place, and the memoirs [letters] of the apostles or the writings of the prophets are read, as long as time permits; then, when the reader has ceased, the president [the presiding priest or bishop] verbally instructs, and exhorts to the imitation of these good things."

Just as with the inability of the Church to ordain women, I think the proclamation of the Gospel and its interpretation within the liturgy of the Mass is a constitutive element of the apostolic nature of the Church. As a result, it cannot be compromised. Every time we recite the Nicene Creed, we affirm that: " I believe in one, holy, catholic and apostolic Church." It is this Church to which the German Bishops belong, and I pray it stays that way.



Tuesday, 23 June 2026

Solemnity of the Nativity of St John the Baptist

 It intrigues me that the Church celebrates this feast day as a solemnity. There are only two other birthdays celebrated liturgically in the Roman calendar - Christmas on 25 December, which is a solemnity and holy day of obligation, and 8 September which is the Nativity of Our Lady which is classified as a feast. I would have thought that Our Lady's birthday would therefore be considered a solemnity. Instead, I think we have the Immaculate Conception of Our Lady which is a solemnity but not, in New Zealand, a holy day of obligation. The latter is related to the Solemnity of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary on 15 August which is the patronal feast of New Zealand and a holyday of obligation. The reason for St John the Baptist to have this honour I think is related to the high regard in which the saint was held by Our Lord who said of him: "Truly I tell you, among those born of women no one has arisen greater that John the Baptist." (Mtt 11: 11) Furthermore, in the second reading for the Office of readings for today in the Divine Office St Augustine tells us how St John the Baptist plays a pivotal role in the transition from the Old Testament to the New: " John marks the frontier between the Old and the New Testaments. The Lord speaks of him as the boundary line....". It is John who is the precursor: "John was a 'voice', but in the beginning the Lord was the Word. John was a voice for a time: but Christ, who in the beginning was the Word, is the Word in eternity."





Monday, 22 June 2026

13th Sunday in Ordinary Time

 Jesus tells his disciples: "Whoever welcomes you, welcomes me..." (Mtt 10: 40) which addresses how God considers those to whom the missionary disciples are sent to preach. The message is reminiscent of the Judgment of the Gentiles (Mtt 25: 31-46). In both teachings the reward from God is given on the basis of how the individual treats the evangelists who represent Christ. This reminds me of a saying related by Archbishop Mark Coleridge who said: "When people are looking for Christ may they find me and when they find me may they find Christ." This reminds us that the Church is not primarily a social, political or religious institution. She is a prolongation of the Incarnation and his saving mission to the world. To understand this better at Vatican II we were given the description as the People of God with the accompanying images, among others, of the Mystical Body of Christ and the Bride of Christ. If this is to be the case then we need to be, individually and collectively, found worthy of our association with the Saviour. If we are to be credible ambassadors for Christ our deeds and words must be consistent with his message and example. This entails a higher standard of commitment which gives priority to the mission: "Whoever loves father or mother more than me is not worthy of me; and whoever loves son or daughter more than me; and whoever does not take up the cross and follow me is not worthy of me. Those who find their life will lose it, and those who lose their life for my sake will find it." (Mtt 10: 37-39)



Wednesday, 17 June 2026

Repost - Towards Ongoing Church Reform

 14 Points Toward Ongoing Church Reform


Often, if we pay attention, we see and hear bodies and disciplines outside the Church using our insights and methods to good advantage.  After hearing an interview on National Radio about the 14 points of Management as enunciated by W Edwards Deming, who helped rebuild the Japanese economy after World War II, I thought that maybe the science of economics has something to teach us as we face the challenge of a changing Church.  These ideas were designed for industry to create and maintain maximum efficiency.  Variation was seen as the enemy by Deming.  For Christians disunity is the enemy.  I would also count as enemies hypocrisy, fatalism and cynicism. 

When we look at the verbs used in the 14 Points we can see an obligation on the manager to take initiatives.  He cannot be a man who falls victim to negative influences but rather seeks to act against them.  Deming’s imperatives instruct the manager not to be an overseer or taskmaster but to be a true leader with vision and courage.  This is apparent when the verbs are listed: create-adopt-cease-move towards-improve-institute-institute-drive-out-break-down-eliminate-eliminate-remove-institute.  Only the fourteenth point, significantly, does not place an onus on the manager and qualifies the previous thirteen points, “The transformation is everyone’s job”.

Transformation is not a revolution.  Deming was not looking to recast Japanese society totally but to remodel its industrial and management processes.  A distinction must be made between reform and revolution.  In the former the old state of affairs is renewed from within and ultimately transformed although in continuity with that which preceded it.  The latter is a radical change which creates essentially a new reality.  In this change there is effectively a new creation.  In terms of Church history the work of Saints Francis and Dominic can be seen as reform while the Reformation, in the countries where it prevailed, was revolutionary.  The application of Deming’s principles would not be to create a new revolutionary church but a transformed Church involving existing people and structures but realigning power structures and focusing mission.  For the Church the revolution of the resurrection can be the final goal.

Each commentary is followed by Scripture quotes.  This shows that the early Church had at its disposal an ideal resource in the Bible for establishing and maintaining an organization consistent with Deming’s ideas.  Maybe he was even affected by them!

1. “Create constancy of purpose towards improvement”

At heart this is a question of vision.  The impetus behind a purpose of improvement is a higher value.  In the case of Deming it might be the value of quality.  Such a value transcends the identity of the collective and draws it on.  This desire for self-transcendence means that the participation of the managers and workers becomes not just a question of productivity but of identity.  The organization serves something or someone beyond itself and the desire to improve finds its motivation there.  The purpose ultimately feeds on itself as the improvements are made and the identity is affirmed the greater the desire to continue the process of improvement.

The manager therefore should always be looking toward the long term and not be satisfied with short-term reactions or expediency.  Occasional mistakes or missteps should not derail the strategy and plan of the Parish.  The constant purpose of the priest in liturgy and administration with an eye to improvement means that the parish and its staff are not going to stagnate.  Hopefully this desire to improve will catch on with the parishioners who will also strive to make their parish a more faithful, loving and hospitable community.

Rev 21:1-3 “Then I saw a new heaven and a new earth; for the first heaven and the first earth had passed away, and the sea was no more.  And I was the holy city, the new Jerusalem, coming down out from heaven from god, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband.”

1 Cor 9:24 “Do you not know that in a race the runners all compete, but only one receives the prize?  Run in such a way that you may win it.”

Heb 3:12-14 “Take care, brothers and sisters, that one of you may have an evil, unbelieving heart that turns away from the living God.  But exhort one another every day, as long as it is called “today,” so that no one of you may be hardened by the deceitfulness of sin.  For we have become partners in Christ, if only we hold our first confidence firm to the end.”

Phil 3: 12-14, “Not that I have already reached this or have already reached the goal; but I press on to make it my own, because Christ Jesus has made me his own.  Beloved, I do not consider that I have made it my own; but this one thing I do: forgetting what lies behind and straining forward to what lies ahead, I press on toward the goal for the prize of the heavenly call of God in Christ Jesus.”

2. “Adopt the new philosophy”

Since Vatican II, the most recent reform of the Catholic Church, was a conservative reform with the intention of getting the Church back in touch with its first inspiration and Mission, it was at the same time a radical reform.  This is because Jesus challenged and subverted the human structures of the time that were not in conformity with the Father’s will.  Thus, the Church at almost 2,000 years old was asked to return to its primary sources.  Such a change is always going to be difficult to do for an organization that is 100 years old let alone 2000.  The new philosophy is therefore an attitude rather than a concrete set of directives.  The management are not always sure what will happen because the inspiration and energy of the original vision was so powerful in the first place.

We can apply this to the intentions and the spirit of Vatican II.  The main principles being that the paradigm of baptism is adult baptism, the Church is the People of God, the Church must engage with and empathize with the world and that all of us are called to holiness.  All of these have implications far beyond the present and the short or medium term.  The management, even though it cannot see what exactly the fruit of the reform will be, has to trust that the philosophy is a sound structure and that the reform will yield fruit even when the times get tough.  To do otherwise is to lose faith in the reform and to compromise or go backwards which will end in failure.   

Lk 5:37-38 “And no one puts new wine into old wineskins; otherwise the new wine will burst the skins and will be spilled, and the skins will be destroyed.  But new wine must be put into fresh wineskins.”

3. “Cease dependence on inspection”

Dependence on inspection, or he gaining of permission radically inhibits the dynamism of an organization.  It also derails the principle of subsidiarity whereby the person closest to the problem is the one who should deal with it.  Two problems are apparent: Firstly, people who must wait for inspection or permission lose ownership of their local situation and leave problem solving to others.  They decline to take initiatives and wait to be asked to accomplish tasks which may be self-evident.  Secondly, people who lose confidence in the management structure are tempted to either leave the organization altogether or set up structures within the structure to suit themselves.  This naturally enough this causes tension as those who wait for permission resent those who grant themselves license and those who initiate new structures are frustrated with the larger structure.

This relates to enabling and encouraging lay participation.  To empower people in the parish to take legitimate initiatives, to pray and work without the need to be supervised personally by the priest, is a laudable objective.  It means that the priests will have to end being control freaks and that the people will not always wait for “Father” to come up with all the ideas.  Just because the priest is not there doesn’t mean that the activity is less Catholic.  The concept of the sensus fidelium underpins this concept.  This means that the people themselves have an awareness of what it means to be Catholic which is predictable since they are as much Church as are the hierarchy.

The reputation of the Church in the past decades has been that it is authoritarian in its approach.  However, a closer look will reveal that it is demand based.  The priests respond to the desires of the people and seek to meet their needs.  Since the people wish to be Catholic they are open to the priest and his teaching about what it means to be Catholic so they can undersand it more profoundly.  At the same time the priest is open to learning from them.

LK 9:49-50 “John answered, “Master, we saw someone casting out demons in your name, and we tried to stop him, because he does not follow with us.”  But Jesus said to him, “Do not stop him; for whoever is not against you is for you.”

Mtt 24: 45-47 “Who then is the faithful and wise slave, whom his master has put in charge of his household, to give the other slaves their allowance of food at the proper time?  Blessed is that slave whom his master will find at work when he arrives.  Truly I tell you, he will put that one in charge of all his possessions.”

4. “Move towards a single supplier for any one item.”

The Church is like a sacrament, or living sign of Christ who in turn is the living sign of God the Father.  Therefore, the church is limited to Christ but God is not limited to the Church.  Christ is the supplier of grace and our salvation.  The Church cannot be tempted to yield to other forms of spirituality or prayer which are contrary to the Gospel.  This will cause conflict and confusion since the people all need to work towards the same goal.

Lk 16:13 “No slave can serve two masters; for a slave will either hate the one and love the other, or be devoted to the one and despise the other.”

Gal 1:7b-8 “there are some who are confusing you and want to pervert the gospel of Christ.  But even if we or an angel from heaven should proclaim to you a gospel contrary to the gospel contrary to what we proclaimed to you, let that one be accursed”

Mtt 23:8-12 “But you are not to be called rabbi, for you have one teacher, and you are all students.  And call no one on your father on earth, for you have one Father-the one in heaven.  Nor are you to be called instructors, for you have one instructor, the Messiah.  The greatest among you will be your servant.  All who exalt themselves will be humbled, and all who humble themselves will be exalted.”

And

Eph 4:4-6 “There is one body and one Spirit, just as you were called to the one hope of your calling, one Lord , one faith, one baptism, one God and Father of all, who is above all and through all and in all.”

5. “Improve constantly and forever.”

This principle looks very much like the first.  The purpose of improvement must be manifest in action.  To constantly improve saves the trauma of sporadic and occasional reform.  This is different from the ongoing revolution of Mao as it is not imposed on the people but emerges from the desire for transformation.

The reform of Vatican II has only really just begun.  It took forty years to get over the shock of having a Council and now we can start getting on with the real work.  The Church is always in need of reform and this will certainly be the case for our life time.  If the need to improve is embraced the results will be apparent in our own lives and in the lives of others.  The Church in New Zealand is at a precious stage of its growth.  For most of its existence it was informed by first French and then Irish history and experience.  It now has the opportunity to grow according to its own identity in an organic fashion rather than periodically shedding its exoskeleton.  For this to happen the members of the Church need to strive constantly to implement the vision of the Council and its reforms.

Mtt 5:48 “Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.”

Rom 14:17-19 “For the kingdom of God is not food an drink but righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy Spirit.  The one who thus serves Christ is acceptable to God and has human approval.  Let us then pursue what makes for peace and for mutual upbuilding.”

And

Eph 4:15-16 “But speaking the truth in love, we must grow up in every way into him who I the head, into Christ, from whom the whole body, joined and knit together by every ligament with which it is equipped, as each part is working properly, promotes the body’s growth in building itself up in love.”

6. “Institute training on the job.”

This can be applied to preaching and the way in which we relate to and deal with others.  To be truly collaborative, even if, on the face of it, it is inefficient will structure in continuity and a sharing of burdens.  No one is indispensable.  Since the training is on the job the danger of careerism is avoided as people get to employ their talents and skills rather than being promoted into them and then having to learn.  By living what is preached we are training others also how to be as Church. 

It is also important that the verb is institute.  It is not necessary for the manager to do the training.  If the skills base is wide enough and the workers are not dependant on inspection they are able to train one another.

1 Pet 5:1b-4 “I exhort the elders among you to tend the flock of God that is in your charge, exercising the oversight, not under compulsion but willingly, as God would have you do it-not for sordid gain but eagerly.  Do not lord it over those in your charge, but be examples to the flock.  And when the chief shepherd appears, you will win the crown of glory that never fades away.”

Also

Phil 3: 17 “Brothers and sisters, join in imitating me, and observe those who live according to the example you have in us.”

7. “Institute leadership”

There is a difference between leadership and mere supervision.  The latter is quota and target based.  The good manager cannot simply be satisfied with having solid numbers and “overseeing” the parish.  The priest is a presence among the people not just inside but also outside of the Eucharist.  As an ontological change the Sacrament of Holy Orders conforms the priest in persona Christi Capitis.  It is not his function but his presence that is paramount.  His preaching but also in his life in the parish is of the greatest importance.    Occasionally the priest should be satisfied to do little but be present to events in the parish and community’s life.  He does not always have to say grace.

The word “institute” again alerts us to the reality that the priest or manager is not the only one who leads.  He may have a qualitative difference in terms of presence and role from the people but they are all capable of leading.  To allow for this to happen the priest needs to be aware of the boundaries of his role and have the flexibility to let others lead even if on occasions he could do so himself.  This is an integral part of training on the job.

Lk 22: 24-27 “A dispute also arose among them as to which one of them was to be regarded as the greatest.  But he said to them, “The kings of the Gentiles lord it over them; and those in authority over them are called benefactors.  But not so with you; rather the greatest among you must become like the youngest, and the leader like one who serves.  For who greater, the one who is at the table or the one who serves?  Is it not the one at the table?  But I am among you as one who serves.”

Mk 5: 35-37 When it grew late, his disciples came to him and said, “This is a deserted place, and the hour I now very late; send them away so that they may go into the surrounding country and villages and but something for themselves to eat.”  But he answered them, “You give them something to eat.”

8. “Drive out fear.”

Fear must be dealt with assertively by managers and it is primarily his responsibility.  This applies to fear exerted on the people from above and among them as well as within the manager himself.  The virtue of “fear of the Lord” is not a fear of punishment or judgment from some headmaster God.  Rather it is awe at the mystery of God and the strong desire not to offend one who is so good and loving to me.  Fear of change is natural and requires trust to overcome such obstacles.  The manager has to establish a relationship based on trust before being able to get the people to move forward.  This will not happen if the priest himself is captive to fear and will not make the first steps.

The last thing that our parishioners should do is fear the priest.  Occasionally it is tempting to use fear to get people to act in their own interest but this must be avoided  Even if the people get things wrong or are having trouble they need not fear the wrath of the priest but be encouraged to keep improving.  Much of the resentment against the Church when people have had the Church instill fear in them either when they were at school or from the pulpit.

1 John 4:18 “There is no fear in love, but perfect love casts out fear; for fear has to do with punishment, and whoever fears has not reached perfection in love.”

2 Cor 2:3-4 “And I wrote as I did, so that when I came, I might not suffer pain from those who should have made me rejoice; for I am confident about all of you, that my joy would  be of joy of all of you.  For I wrote to you out of much distress and anguish of heart and with many tears, not to cause you pain, but to let you know the abundant love that I have for you.”

Rom 8:15 “For you did not receive a spirit of slavery to fall back into fear, but you have received a spirit of adoption”

9. “Break down barriers between departments.”

Barriers of any description impede the implementation of reform.  Sectors of the organization will strive to find ways of exempting themselves from the sometimes arduous process of transformation.  Barriers also do not allow for the flexibility demanded by the other points.

Barriers invite the danger of binary oppositions: winners and losers, Protestant and Catholic, conservative and liberal.  This encourages rivalry and unhealthy competitiveness rather than people working together regardless of where they are in the organization. Any manager will be labeled as belonging to a particular group which will automatically diminish his effectiveness.  The ensuing conflict with other managers who have identified with other factions results in internecine warfare which can be exploited by the more unscrupulous by gaining advantage purely for political motives.

For the Church we need to break down barriers within the Church and with other churches.  Other religions also need to be acknowledged in the areas in which we can work together.  To be brave enough to do this the Church needs to be aware of what is important and what is not.  It has a tendency to work on historical problems rather than those of the church today.  In this sense it has to break down barriers to living in the present either by remaining in the past or moving too quickly into a perceived future.  

Another factor is the reality that the local church is the Diocese and not the parish.  However, the idea of the “internal customer” means that we strive to look after all communities and groups of the faithful with regard to their needs rather than exploiting their good will or sacrificing smaller communities for the sake of bigger ones.  The key term for the priest or manager is complementarity.

1 Cor 1:10 “Now I appeal to you, brothers and sisters, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that all of you be in agreement and that there be no divisions among you, but that you be united in the same mind and the same purpose.”

Gal 3:28 “There is no longer Jew or Greek, there is no longer slave or free, there is no longer male and female; for all of you are one in Christ Jesus. 

Jn 1720 “I ask not only on behalf of these, but also on behalf of those who will believe in me through their word, that they may all be one.  As you, Father, re in me and I am in you, may they also be in us, so that the world may believe that you have sent me.”

10. “Eliminate slogans”

“...it’s not people who make the most mistakes-it’s the process they are working within.  Harassing the workforce without improving the processes they use is counter productive.”  This, applied to the Church, can tell us not to motivate people without considering the bigger picture of how I actually work with them and the process of decision making in the parish.  A priest can be in danger of having the people tell him what they think he wants to hear or of waiting till he evinces an opinion before speaking their minds.

1 Cor 1:3 “For it has been reported to me by Chloe’s people that there are quarrels among you, my brothers and sisters.  What I mean is that each of you says, “I belong to Paul,” or “I belong to Apollos,’ or “I belong to Christ.”  Has Christ been divided?

11. “Eliminate management by objectives.”

This speaks of management not by managers but by objectives.  Such an impersonal approach cannot take account of the variations in conditions faced by workers.  Staff are burnt out by expectations and targets that often are impossible to meet.  Rather than admit failure or burn out the individuals trickle away leaving a greater burden on the staff who remain.  Consequently, this leads to a greater chance of that group leaving also.  The ability of managers to establish healthy ongoing relationships with motivated staff is always going to bring about the optimal result.

The Church needs to ask itself are there unspoken, implicit or explicit targets in the parish?  Does this encourage people to work in such away that the quality of education, catechesis or liturgy is impaired?  Often we are oppressed by the mass-count from last year or the planned giving total.  Such an approach is concerned with transformation but simply what will produce the best results in the short term.  This will always be damaging as the intention of the reform is not primarily about numbers but the conforming of the church to the Mission given it by Christ.

Mtt 6:34 “So do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will bring worries of its own.  Today’ trouble is enough for today.”

Lk 15:7 “Just so I tell you, there will be more joy in heaven over one sinner who repents than over ninety-nine righteous persons who need no repentance.”

12. “Remove barriers to pride of workmanship”

Barriers to pride of workmanship occur when workers are alienated from the product and treated as machines.  If they participate in the vision of the whole they will see how their respective efforts fit in.  Isolating sections of the work force and compartmentalizing them will serve to reinforce a situation where the workers and the management regard each other with jealousy and hostility.

This can be effected by continually praising and thanking those who make efforts to forward the Kingdom of God.  It is still important to affirm young people and the not so young.  The worst possible scenario is that the parishioners become so discouraged that they give up and drift away.  The enthusiasm of the pastor and the praising of a job well done cannot be underestimated.

1 Cor 3:5-9 “What then is Apollos?  What is Paul? Servants through whom you came to believe, as the Lord assigned to each.  I planted, Apollos watered, but God gave the growth.  So neither the one who plants nor the one who waters is anything, but only God who gives the growth.  The one who plants and the one who waters have a common purpose, and each will receive wages according to the labour of each.  For we are God’s servants, working together; you are God’s field, God’s building.”

1 Thess 1:2-5 “We always give thanks to God for all of you and mention you in our prayers, constantly remembering before our God and Father your work of faith and labour of love and steadfastness of hope in our Lord Jesus Christ.  For we know, brothers and sisters beloved by God that he has chosen you because our message of the gospel came to you not in word only, but also in power and in the Holy Spirit and with full conviction; just as you know what kind of persons we proved to be among you for your sake.”

13. “Institute education and self-improvement”

What does I mean to institute something?  It means to initiate and to establish something as a part of the life of the institution.  Ultimately it does not need to be questioned but is taken as a part of the way of life of those involved in the project.  People throughout the Church should take it for granted that they will have self-improvement and ongoing education as a part of their lives both spiritually and professionally.

There is always a need for the priest to maintain his reading and to refresh his ideas.  Priestly renewal prevents burnout and cynicism.  It is a shame if a priest travels for the whole of his priestly ministry on what he learnt at the Seminary.  If there is going to be ongoing improvement the priest will have to be open to improving and educating himself.  If the priest does not know what he is talking about how can the people be expected to know?

2 Tim 3:14-17 “But as for you, continue in what you have learned and firmly believed, knowing from whom you learnt it, and how from childhood you have known the sacred writings that are able to instruct you for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus. All scripture is inspired by God and is useful for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, so that everyone who belongs to God may be proficient, equipped for every good work.”

Phil 4:8-9 “Finally beloved, whatever is true, whatever is honorable, whatever is pure, whatever is pleasing, whatever is commendable, if there is any excellence and if there is anything worthy of praise, think about these things.  Keep on doing these things that you have learned and received and heard and seen in me, and the God of peace will be with you.”

14. “The transformation is everyone’s job.”

The scope of reform is open ended since the purpose of improvement is unending.  This means that reform, if it is to be successful, must affect the whole of the organization.  For the organization to be transformed the members of it also must be transformed according to the life and aims of the organization they constitute.  The job of transformation must necessarily belong to everyone because they ultimately are the organization and the transformation in themselves.  If the individuals change then the whole will change.  The job of the manager is to inspire, facilitate and coordinate the change that is achieved by everyone working together.

For the Church this can be seen as another major principle of Vatican II.  The individuals are Church together as the People of God.  They cannot exist as church as individuals. It is a hierarchical communion so there is a reality of the bishops and priests leading but they do so through service.  They are also primarily oriented to the welfare of the Church itself while the primary orientation of the laity is towards the world.  The priests and laity complement and support each other rather than compete for power, status or prestige.  The reform of the Church therefore belongs to everybody.

1 Peter 2:9 “But you are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, God’s own people, in order that you proclaim the mighty acts of him who called you out of darkness into his own marvelous light.”

2 Cor 3:17-18 “And all of us, with unveiled faces, seeing the glory of the Lord as though reflected in a mirror, are being transformed into the same image from one degree of glory to another; for this comes from the Lord, the Spirit.

“Deming has been criticized for putting forward a set of goals without providing any tools for managers (priests) to use to reach those goals (just the problem he identified in point 10).  His inevitable response to the question was: “You’re the manager (priest), you figure it out””

The letters of Paul as he strove to organize and manage his churches from a distance are especially helpful in seeing how modern principles of management and church reform can learn from each other.  The danger for the manager/priest is that he becomes timorous.  Held captive by the fear of failure, he becomes paralyzed and implements his tasks by using authority in rigid and unproductive ways.  2 Timothy is an excellent example of Paul exhorting his deputy not to lose sight of the vision and to keep striving despite opposition: 

“...I remind you to rekindle the gift of God that is within you through the laying on of my hands; for God did not give us a spirit of cowardice, but rather a spirit of power and of love and of self-discipline(1:6b-7)...Hold to the standard of sound teaching that you have heard from me, in the faith and love that are in Christ Jesus.  Guard the good treasure entrusted to you, with the help of the Holy Spirit living in us(1:13-14)...No one serving in the army gets entangled in everyday affairs; the soldier’s aim is to please the enlisting officer(2:4)...Do your best to present yourself to God as one approved by him, a worker who has no need to be ashamed, rightly explaining the word of truth.(2:15)...Shun youthful passions and pursue righteousness, faith, love and peace, along with those who call on the Lord from a pure heart.  Have nothing to do with stupid and senseless controversies; you know that they breed quarrels.  And the Lord’s servant must not be quarrelsome but kindly to everyone, an apt teacher, patient, correction opponents with gentleness(2:22-25)...as for you, continue in what you have learned and firmly believed, knowing from whom you learnt it(3:14)...I solemnly urge you: proclaim the message; be persistent whether the time is favorable or unfavorable; convince, rebuke and encourage, with the utmost patience in teaching(4:1b-2)...As for you, always be sober, endure suffering, do the work of an evangelist, carry out your ministry fully.”


Material for this article was taken from the webpage: http://www.hci.com.au/hcisite2/articles/deming.htm