Jesus tells his disciples: "Whoever welcomes you, welcomes me..." (Mtt 10: 40) which addresses how God considers those to whom the missionary disciples are sent to preach. The message is reminiscent of the Judgment of the Gentiles (Mtt 25: 31-46). In both teachings the reward from God is given on the basis of how the individual treats the evangelists who represent Christ. This reminds me of a saying related by Archbishop Mark Coleridge who said: "When people are looking for Christ may they find me and when they find me may they find Christ." This reminds us that the Church is not primarily a social, political or religious institution. She is a prolongation of the Incarnation and his saving mission to the world. To understand this better at Vatican II we were given the description as the People of God with the accompanying images, among others, of the Mystical Body of Christ and the Bride of Christ. If this is to be the case then we need to be, individually and collectively, found worthy of our association with the Saviour. If we are to be credible ambassadors for Christ our deeds and words must be consistent with his message and example. This entails a higher standard of commitment which gives priority to the mission: "Whoever loves father or mother more than me is not worthy of me; and whoever loves son or daughter more than me; and whoever does not take up the cross and follow me is not worthy of me. Those who find their life will lose it, and those who lose their life for my sake will find it." (Mtt 10: 37-39)
My Weekly Blurb - Scripture for Today
Monday, 22 June 2026
Wednesday, 17 June 2026
Repost - Towards Ongoing Church Reform
14 Points Toward Ongoing Church Reform
The Church needs to ask itself are there unspoken, implicit or explicit targets in the parish? Does this encourage people to work in such away that the quality of education, catechesis or liturgy is impaired? Often we are oppressed by the mass-count from last year or the planned giving total. Such an approach is concerned with transformation but simply what will produce the best results in the short term. This will always be damaging as the intention of the reform is not primarily about numbers but the conforming of the church to the
Monday, 15 June 2026
12th Sunday in Ordinary Time
When I was at the seminary from 1995-2001 there was little discussion or teaching about what we might call "spiritual warfare." Angels were considered in scripture classes as a literary device. Over time, as I have been involved in house blessings of buildings afflicted by spiritual disorder and other situations of spiritual discomfort, I have come to realize the significance of the conflict between objective evil and the holy. Whenever we pray the Eucharistic Prayer we are reminded by the Church that we pray together with the angels and the saints. The Universe is not neutral. St Francis de Sales writes: "This life is a continual warfare and there is no one who can say, I am not attacked." (LR III, 48) In today's Gospel Jesus warns: "Do not fear those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul; rather fear him who can destroy both soul and body in hell." (Mt 10: 28) The sacraments help us to resist evil and to do good. St Francis assures us: "Our victory does not lie in our not feeling imperfections, but in not consenting to them." (In I 5) We also have the consolation of knowing that our heavenly Father supports us in our times of trial and loves us with an everlasting and merciful love: "So do not be afraid; you are of more value than many sparrows." (Mt 10: 21)
Monday, 8 June 2026
11th Sunday in Ordinary Time
The theme of missionary discipleship is front and centre in today's Gospel. Can you see how it applies to us as it did for the original disciples? Jesus notices that the crowds are "harassed and helpless, like sheep without a shepherd (Mtt 9: 36) In an age where mistrust in civil authorities is increasing and there are so many competing narratives it is apparent to many that those who have no sense of objective truth struggle. Jesus is not indifferent to this plight. It draws his compassion and it should ours. We, who serve him, need also to feel for the world and society rather than condemn it. The Council Fathers in their fourth constitution wrote: "The joys and the hopes, the griefs and the anxieties of the men of this age, especially those who are poor or in any way afflicted, these are the joys and hopes, the griefs and anxieties of the followers of Christ. Indeed, nothing genuinely human fails to raise an echo in their hearts." (GS, 1) The number of those ready to continue the work of Jesus is small. Jesus summons his disciples by name, just as he summons and commissions each one of us in Baptism and Confirmation, so that they can be sent out to gather the harvest. He gives his disciples, then and now, the authority to cast out evil and to heal, whether in body or in spirit. He urges them and us to start with the people closest to us. The good news we preach is the Good News that God's kingdom is a reality and is near to all who are prepared to accept it. Why would we embark on such an arduous task for no earthly reward? - "You received without payment; give without payment." (Mtt 10: 8) The answer is given in the Second Reading: "But God proves his love for us in that while we still were sinners Christ died for us... For if while we were enemies, we were reconciled to God through the death of his Son, much more surely, having been reconciled, will we be saved by his life." (Rm 5: 6 and 10)
Feast of the Sacred Heart of Jesus
The heart is the core of our being. The symbol of the heart is used to communicate the emotion of love. Our God, far from being the cold, aloof and unfeeling God of theism is a God of love. We hear in the First Reading: "It was not because you were more numerous than any other people that the Lord has set his heart on you and chose you." (Deut 7: 7) If we had any doubts as to this state of affairs we are given the consoling words of the image of God, the Son of the Father, that: "Come to me, all you that are weary and are carrying heavy burdens, and I will give you rest. Take my yoke upon you, and learn from me; for I am gentle and humble of heart, and you will find rest for you souls." (Mtt 11: 28-29) The loving heart of God asks for a loving response not just to him but also for others whom he created and loves: "Beloved, since God loved us so much, we also ought to love one another. No one has ever seen God, if we love one another, God lives in us, and his love is perfected in us. By this we know that we abide in him and he in us, because he has given us his Spirit." (1 Jn 4: 11-13) To open our hearts to God's thus allows us to share in the Divine life of the Holy Trinity, as the Holy Spirit brings about unity and peace in all God's children.
Wednesday, 3 June 2026
How did the German Bishops get it so wrong?
Many Catholics around the globe were astonished at the events that occurred in Germany over the last few years regarding the Synodal Path. In it the German Bishops Conference seemed on the verge of voting into being a supervisory or governance body, called a Synodal Council, comprised of laity and clergy. If it was put into effect, this body would denature the office of bishop as the Catholic Church understands it as well as other canonical structures. Pope Francis, interviewed on the airplane on his trip back from Bahrain, said: “I say to German Catholics: Germany has a great Protestant Church, but I don’t want another one, because it won’t be as good.” On 17 February 2024 it was confirmed that the German Bishops would not proceed to a vote on the Council. It appears that the threat to Church unity has passed. The question I pose in this blog is: "How did the German Bishops get it so wrong?" (Please note that I have not given extensive footnotes for this presentation. If there is appetite for further discussion or queries about it I am happy to provide them)
My response to this is first to go back into the history of how lay people are thought to engage in the Church in governance. As the Church developed in the 19th Century many lay organizations started to come into existence. As time went by the issues arose as to how lay leaders in these organizations related to Church hierarchy. The issue came to a head when Pope Pius XI wrote a letter to cardinal Bertrams about the relationship, which at that time had no canonical description. He stated that: "“the laity participate in some way in the apostolate of the hierarchy” (laici apostolatum hierarchicum quodammodo participent)." This was ultimately unhelpful. What did "in some way" actually mean? What does this mean in Canon Law?
Without going exhaustively into the matter, on which I have written a doctoral thesis, we can say that prior to Vatican II two German theologians posited that laity could participate in the exercise of the power of governance through the bestowal of a mandate from an ecclesiastical authority. This could be interpreted in a broad or a strict manner. The broad interpretation was given by Karl Rahner while the strict was proposed by Sebastian Tromp. The former saw laity as effectively forming a parallel hierarchy while the latter saw the laity as instruments in the hand of the hierarchy with little freedom to act. Another German theologian, Joseph Ratzinger, writing in 1996 at the time of the Instruction Ecclesiae de mysterio, summed up the two positions in this way:
"This appears extremely important to avoid, on the one hand, an undervaluing of the ordained ministry and a falling into a “Protestantization” of the concept of ministry and of the Church herself, and, on the other, the risk of a “clericalization” of the laity ... This gives rise to a “functionalistic” conception of the ministry which sees the ministry of “pastor” as a function and not as an ontological sacramental reality."
Effectively, Tromp and Rahner, were maintaining the distinction between the power of orders and the power of jurisdiction. They believed this meant jurisdiction would be given to suitable laity independent of Holy Orders. What they had not paid attention to was that if such a distinction did in fact exist the doctrine from the Nota explicativa praevia in Lumen gentium would have taught them that the ontologico-sacramental takes precedence with the canonico-juridico aspect being a further norm required for Church order. In reality, the Council Fathers has abolished the distinction and created a new category which is the "power of governance." The canon which brings this about is canon 129 from the 1983 Code of Canon Law.
In brief, the German Bishops' Conference had continued in the mistaken theology of Karl Rahner even though it had been repudiated by the Council Fathers in Lumen Gentium, 33 and Apostolicam Actuositatem, 24. This was prefigured prior to Vatican II by both the theologian Yves Congar in his book Lay People in the Church (1957) and Pope Pius XII in his address to the Second World Congress of the Lay Apostolate (1957). The juridical implications for this theology which set up that which was decided at Vatican II was formulated by Bishop Narciso Jubany Arnau in 1960 when he wrote:
"The idea of participation has, perhaps, given place to inexact conclusions. If to participate signifies entering in the ladder of the hierarchy as if it was divided in two, then the term is seriously incorrect [Rahner’s approach]. If he means that the laity are those constituted as some subordinate auxiliaries, directors, engineers and robots of the apostolate who are part of the Hierarchy, then we are found outside the field of the true apostolate, because it supposes a negation of their theological values, that truly bases the action and the activity of the Christian inside the Body of the Church [Tromp’s approach]. If to participate intends to indicate the identity of the same holy end, then our understanding is right although incomplete. It must signify something more: that the laity, bound to the hierarchy, take part in the authentic apostolate of the Church, and participate, according to his capacity, in the same mission that Jesus Christ showed to his apostles in the Commission for the salvation of the world. In other words, the idea of participation in the hierarchical apostolate states more clearly, on one hand, the intimacy of the participant with the participation, and on the other, the intimate dependence of the first with the second. But such intimacy and dependence do not signify by themselves - in virtue of the force of the word - nothing else: they do not necessarily carry with them the communication of an ontological element, totally new, that changes the theological and juridical nature of the lay apostolate. In any case, that part is taken by an extrinsic principle: the mandate. But then the participation signifies a more intimate linking of the activity of the laity with the Hierarchy, to constitute a unique apostolate, that of the Church, that supposes necessarily the concrete realization of diverse functions and two distinct levels: that of the hierarchy and that of the laity."
What, then, you might ask was the correct approach? Jubany Arnau goes on to write:
"The idea of collaboration, used in the pontifical texts [Pius XII in 1951 and 1957], clearly indicates the personality of the layperson who works according to his condition in a unique apostolate: which is that of the hierarchy, which is that of the Church. And for the other part, excludes all the possible bad ideas of participation [Rahner and Tromp]. Certainly, although an action proper to the laity exists, the apostolate of the laity, in its intrinsic sense, always supposes in one form or another an active association of various causes, works ordered to the acquisition of common ends. The hierarchy works in its field, principally through the hierarchical functions, the laity in theirs, however, always united to the hierarchy. Everyone must meet each other, across a collaboration that must be perfect, in the supreme synthesis of the whole true apostolate, that is, ecclesiality."
Jubany Arnau was present on the Group of Bishops which was charged, along with a Group of Experts, with finalizing Canon 129 paragraph 2 of the 1983 Code of Canon Law which legislates that: "In exercizio eiusdem potestatis, christefideles laici ad normam iuris cooperari possunt" (In the exercize of the same power (power of governance) the lay Christian faithful can cooperate according the norm of the law).
As a result, we see that the concept of the Synodal Council was from the outset a radical misunderstanding of what it means to be Church and the power of governance. The German Bishops had been following their own theology instead of listening attentively to Vatican II and the Papal Magisterium. Let that be a warning to all of us lest we make fools of ourselves as the German Bishops did! To paraphrase Oscar Wilde - Being to blame for one Protestant reformation may be regarded as a misfortune but to be blamed for two looks like carelessness!
Sunday, 31 May 2026
Repost of Church as Bride in the Holy Eucharist
Some time ago, on this blog, I published a post to investigate how we can understand the image of the Church as bride in the Holy Eucharist. On the feast of the Most Holy Body and Blood of Christ it occurs to me that how we engage with this great mystery has a lot to do with our images of Church. For the Mass in the extra-ordinary form the principle image is that of the Mystical Body of Christ. In the post-conciliar liturgy it has been the People of God. I do not intend to elaborate on these images here, however, each has far reaching implications for both celebrant and congregation in terms of their prayer and Eucharistic spirituality. Neither is wrong but then neither is completely correct or exhaustive. I would like to look at the image of the Church as Bride of Christ with the aim of helping us to understand the dynamics of Mass in the ordinary form.